Brexit Opportunities: what will really make a difference for business?

While there has been much talk since 2016 about the opportunities for the UK to do things differently after Brexit, in practice this has proved difficult. In particular given that the EU is the leading global regulatory power, the costs of change from this have become more evident.

Opportunities may be harder to find than had been expected, but there will still be areas where the UK now has more freedom than previously. As a major global player in financial services, and given that equivalence arrangements were not put in place, there may be an opportunity for changes in approach. There have been some improvements made to the unilateral preferences given to developing countries, while visa policy has clearly evolved. Changes to schemes for agricultural land are another example, while negotiations over access to UK waters are now conducted on a different basis.

Business is calling for predictability and stability more than changes for their own sake from the EU approach. Pressure groups have been wary of divergence being equivalent to downgrading of protections. Yet there should be opportunities to demonstrate the UK doing things in a better way.

Questions for discussion

How can we best identify the areas in which a genuine Brexit opportunity exists?

Is it inevitable that the need for EU market access will affect these?

What would be a good, realistic result for the UK in terms of fishing negotiations?

Are there sectors other than financial services where the UK is sufficiently strong to be a major player on global rules? What benefit can that bring?

Policy Options

Trade Unlocked 2023’s policy partner, the UK Trade and Business Commission, has recently published a comprehensive report containing policy recommendations to the UK Government.

The lead recommendation of the UK Trade and Business Commission is that ‘The UK Government should adopt a general policy of regulatory alignment with EU standards and regulations unless it is not in the UK's interests to do so’ and to consult, produce impact assessments and allow for adjustment times ‘should the UK decide to adopt regulations different from those in the EU’. This work would be assisted by a new UK Board of Trade which would ‘identify areas where the UK can gain economic advantage from actively aligning or diverging from the regulations of our major markets’.

Financial services is an exception, where there is no recommendation for the UK to fully align, rather in 45 to ‘fully implement a financial services Regulatory Cooperation Dialogue to foster a close and productive relationship with EU authorities’. The UK Government has recently started talks with Switzerland which may include financial services regulatory alignment as envisaged in the reports recommendations to ‘ensure the effective implementation of existing FTAs and seek to deepen these agreements where possible’.

TCA coverage of fisheries established arrangements until June 2026 under which part of the EU quota share was transferred to the UK, but with considerable concern in the sector as to how this was done. This led to recommendation that ‘The UK should prepare for the renegotiation of the fisheries chapter of the TCA, by focusing on improved quota shares for the UK's fishing fleet, improved control over UK waters and the reduction of non-tariff barriers, such as shellfish water quality’.


Previous
Previous

The Productivity Institute: Can productivity unlock the UK economic revival?

Next
Next

Supply chains and logistics: managing the economy’s heartbeat